Tag Archives: THeory

Updates on the rigid structure theory of atomic nuclei

On further study of Neon, I found that the center of the atom’s structure, eight neutrons, was too unstable to be bonded by the forces of the two protons on either end of the chain.  The same pole of all eight neutrons pointed mostly into the center of the atomic structure was too much repellent force to keep the atom stable.  Surprisingly, the answer to this dilemma was not only simple, but conserved space and strength of bonding forces while also making the atomic structure more impervious to outside forces tearing it apart.  The solution was to understand that as the carbon atoms that bond to form Neon come together, their neutron ends must attract each other, not repel, this means that the neutrons in the center of the Neon atom form their own attractive bonds as well as causing the protons to enter into a opposite pole attraction, though we know that the protons repel each other, they very likely repel each other even more on their north poles, as magnets do.  Thus the neutrons will not line up end to end as was supposed but instead, grip each other in two rings like gears in a clock.

I will upload a graphic showing this as soon as I can.

This arrangement changes some things, but instead of being detrimental to my theory, it enhances the probability of it being more correct.  It also has inspired some new insights into star structure.

Instead of understanding stars as balls of condensed gasses, I now perceive them to be balls of crystalline matrices, of neutrons and protons stripped of most of their electrons.  This structure explains many things.  As the inside of a star becomes more crystalline, it becomes less chaotic, more stable, less energetic.  Thus the temperature should decrease in stars towards the core.  The core will also react to internal stresses by vibrating, as we know our own star does, like a tuning fork at 126.22 Hz.  You can find this sound on YouTube.  It makes other frequencies as well, but according to my research, this one is more constant.  As the inner section of the star or sun becomes denser, it also becomes less populated with electrons, however the mass still attracts its electrons, but can shed them quite easily due to the violent fusion processes on the outside at the surface of the sun.  Infact, the super amount of electrons that are squeezed out of the core have no where to go but up and out, and turn the mass into a giant plasma ball of electrons and nuclear reactions.

These things are important to my theory for two reasons, one the atoms now have an easier time fusing inside the star because electrons are not present in enough quantities to inhibit proton neutron bonding.  Electrons are very reactive to protons and can make it difficult for a neutron to attach to a proton due to their poles matching the pole of the neutron coming closer to the proton, and because electrons are easily disturbed in their orbital cloud by other electrons and attractions to the poles of other atomic particles nearby.  This exerts a push pull effect on the proton and makes it difficult for any structure to form at all, other than the electron proton form, or Hydrogen, which is the most common element in the cosmos.

The other importance of this more stable neutron neutron bonding discovery in my theory is that it allows for stars to be more dense that at first theorized, more dense and more structured, this allows for the density zones within a star to correlate to density in gravity strength in normal and subspace regions.  As the star’s core is compressed, it is not just compressed in a haphazard manner, but instead, as with magnets, similar poles of sub atomic particles, + + or – – will oppose each other more and more as they come together, and  opposite poles will attract each other more and more as they come together if the alignment is favorable.  This means that the denser the star, the more crystalline the structure will be, the more aligned the poles of the particles will be, and thus the more magnetic the star will become, as the theory states, the electrons around and fields around protons, when aligned in a planar form, will amplify the effect of the forces inside the particles, and cause the field around it to grow by causing the quanta particles to line up into larger and larger rings due to resonance and amplification of the inner vibrations due to the antenna effect the orbitals inside undergo because of their more quasi-solid nature, this part of the theory states that the smaller the orbit of a particle, and the faster it goes, the more it behaves as a solid, able to deflect and reflect other particles, quanta not contained in a field line especially, these free quantas, that hit the orbitals and are ricocheted away from the orbital into other orbitals or free quanta, this is how magnetic fields are formed.

As the star becomes more physically organized inside, the outer area becomes more magnetically organized.  But as my theory states, the more matter is compressed, the more the vibrational energy that forms attractive wave fronts, or gravity vibrations, known as magnetic attraction, are decreased in outside space and increased in sub space.  A star has so much energy, it never made sense, before, as to why they hold together so well for so long.  But now, my theory explains all of this.  Down below is a list of oddities in science that my theory explains:

  1. Why stable elements are limited in number. : because neutron proton bonds are rigid and affect the way an atom can come together in stable structures.
  2. Why some atoms have many isotopes and some have only one, or very few.  : because electrons create chaos and vibrational stresses so that if two protons end up being two close together, the electrons will repel each other, and push the proton to such a sharp angle in its bond with a neutron that the neutron will tear apart from the structure and not allow the atom to be stable enough to exist anymore as it was.  This explains atomic decay.
  3.  How magnetic fields are formed. :because atoms tend to be polar, if they align, as they do in some metals, their outer electron orbitals will act like antenna arrays and cause free quanta to form more electron orbitals that are bigger than the original and these will expand outward up, and back into the poles of the structure forming a magnet.
  4. How gravity is made.  : attractive waves that are magnets, are compressed and cause the sub space mirror particle to vibrate more, and in this smaller space the mirror particles of things are closer together and begin to attract each other more, even though it is a kind of magnetism in subspace, it is felt more strongly and as the mirror particles pull together, they tug on their above space particles and the movement is even stronger and faster in our space.
  5. How movement of electrons, electricity, causes fields to form. :because as electrons move through metals, they align with each other, in a kind of wave or push pull chain, and because they align, the more electrons that are aligning in the wire, the more the material of the wire itself will align with the electrons, which will cause orbitals to become resonant and act like antennas, which will cause free quanta in the atmosphere around the wire to begin forming up resonant wave fronts, which will make bigger orbitals and grow outward, making a magnetic field.


I hope my theory is becoming more clear. And that you have enjoyed discovering these ideas with me.  Thank you for taking the time to read my papers.  Have a great day.



Neon Atomic Structure

When trying to find the Nitrogen atomic structure, based on my theory, I realized that it too was probably a reduction of the next fused atom in the star fusion chain. This put Neon or Magnesium as my next target to decipher. Finding that Neon was discovered to be more common in stars than previously thought, I realized that it was most likely to be the next in the fusion chain of element making found in stars. The fusion chain is H plus H makes He, or Helium. He plus He makes C, or Carbon. C plus C makes Ne, or Neon. Thus it was finally a matter of arranging all the neutrons to form the core of the atom, since protons repel each other, and neutrons help bind them together. But the design had to allow for the electron orbitals to have complete stability in their orbits because those orbitals are full and are not easily displaced, this makes the Nobel gasses inert and nonreactive. Finally, I had to incorporate the polar bonding system of the last structures according to my unified field theory, where neutrons and protons both have north and south poles. Finally, the best, most compact shape I could find, was not only viable, but I noticed that it looks very much like a carbon atom extended by addition of another carbon atom.

The red orbs are the bigger protons, the brown orbs are the smaller neutrons.


As you can see, my theory also supports why isotopes are not always viable structures, therefore a few elements have only one isotope. The electron orbitals put quite a strain on the inner structure’s ability to hold itself together, thus when forming, the atoms quickly deteriorate. I suspect that as the atoms increase in size, the structures will become more complicated, but the protons will almost always be on the outside part of the atom.

My Unified Field Theory Predicting the Beryllium 9 Isotope

In my field theory, Protons mostly repel each other, and mostly bond only with neutrons.  Electrons form ring orbitals at right angles to the axis of protons that they are linked with.  Thus, we have limitations on how easy it is for protons and neutrons to form.

The first atom is of course hydrogen.  It commonly has no neutron, and the electron orbits the hydrogen yet does not fall inwards toward it.  This is explained by the quanta fields surrounding the proton, where inside, we have a doughnut ring with another particle that greatly attracts the electron, thus the proton field pushes against the electron field, but each has a particle that pulls them together.

The next atom is Helium, whose first stable isotope is Helium 3, which is composed of a proton-neutron-proton chain, it is not very abundant. But it is interesting..


The most abundant isotope is Helium 4, which has two protons and two neutrons, and it would look like this:


The next atom is Lithium, which is discussed in the previous post, My Unified Field Theory.  To recap, the most stable configuration of Lithium were two isotopes in ring form.  Lithium 1-5 always have protons touching, very closely, thus none of those were able to form lasting isotopes.  Lithium 6, as helium plus the proton and neutron as a tangent to the helium ring would not work because the bonds are so close together the whole magnetic system forms a ring, it almost imposes a ring formation upon itself.  Lithium 6 as a ring does work.  And Lithium 7, the more abundant lithium isotope is even more stable because the bonds are under less stress at the angles they connect to. No other Lithium isotopes are found to be stable.  This may or may not have to do with the angles in which electron orbital rings cross each other.  If that matters, that would be the final key to understanding Isotope production in the Periodic Table.

Finally we have Beryllium.

We have 3 ways in which to form the most stable isotope, which is Beryllium 9, it has four protons and five neutrons.

Let us first examine the reasons Beryllium 8 decays so quickly.

Beryllium 8 is basically two Helium atoms being pressed together through fusion in stars.


The first combination is one in which no proton is touching as the two come together on their sides, …


As we can see here, one neutron has to be shared by a neutron and a proton, and this is a very weak bond, even among these magnets, this bond is easily broken, more so in the atom where protons actually repel each other.  It is possible the electron rings cross at such an angle that they also create great instability for the atom.  Beryllium 8’s decay particle is actually helium itself, which is an alpha particle.  So it is clear that it is easy to see that if this bond breaks, one of them will definitely be a helium atom, or two protons and two neutrons.

The next configuration is two helium atoms put together in a layer…


Oddly, these neodymium magnets did not hold together very well in this configuration.  All the bonds were weak because they had to bond horizontally instead of from pole to pole.  This layered system fell apart easily, and made a helium atom in the process, just like we see with real world results in alpha decay in Beryllium 8.

The next bonding set up for Beryllium 8 was a ring system….


It is unknown to me why this configuration is unstable.  It is possible that protons are more disk shaped than spherical, just a bit, and my theory proposes just such a situation.  We have here, neutrons between each proton, so none are touching, and the electron orbital rings are at 90 degrees to each other.  If the protons are more doughnut shaped, then perhaps their angles are more limited than we have allowed for them.

The stable Beryllium Isotope is Beryllium 9.  It too is only stable in a ring format.


Here the proton-neutron bonds are in less stressful bonding angles, and the electron orbital rings are still nearly 90 degrees to each other.  It is interesting to note, that Beryllium 10 has a half life of 1.6 million years, which isn’t too short of a life.  It is possible that the extra neutron is found between the other two neutrons, which would explain why when it decays it throws off a beta particle, which is an electron or anti-electron.  This could indicate that neutrons in a neutron-neutron-neutron bond cause the center neutron to become unstable enough to lose its captured electron, which turns it back into a proton.  This would explain its decay products which are an electron, (or positron, which is just an electron spinning backwards) and boron 10.  Which is composed of 5 protons and 5 neutrons, exactly what would happen if a neutron self destructed in a Beryllium 10 ring.

My proposal is that electron orbitals put great stress on the inner structure of the atomic nucleus.  This limits the angles in which stable pole to pole connections can be formed.  Neutron to neutron binding may cause beta decay.  And proton-proton bonding is very limited, if it even occurs at all, which also goes to limit the angles that these sub atomic particles can bond at.  My theory, so far, helps to predict isotopes in the elements from Hydrogen to Beryllium, and possibly Boron.

I hope you enjoyed this theorizing as much as I did.  Have a great day.  And enjoy your weekend. 🙂

Unified Field Theory, Updated with Visuals

I owe many, many people much thanks and if not for the heroes and inventors and explorers, in science, history, math, and life in general, I would have never been able to accomplish this. I have spent nearly 30 years working on “our” theory. I hope you find it as enlightening as I do.

Unified Field Theory,
protons are magnets composed of a spinning, orbiting particle. The axis of the orbit is a connection to subspace, and possibly a twin particle in subspace, much smaller, spinning slower, but its effect is greatly amplified on the speed of the particle in normal space.
subspace connections to space will be slower and smaller, inversely, normal space connections to subspace will be larger and faster. the faster the orbit of a particle in subspace, the greatly amplified the speed of its twin or counter particle in normal space.

neutrons are protons that have been pressed together with the substance of an electron, and the electron is held in the core of the proton, which greatly reduces the fields of both particles, so that the magnetism of the proton is reduced.

protons repel each other because of the inner orbital particle, which is attracted greatly, and matches the charge of the inner part of the electron. It is likely that the size of the inner part of the electron is equal to the size of the inner particle that is orbiting the axis of the proton.

Neutrons repel each other less because of inner field cancellation, due to the electron being inside the proton that it is composed of, thus, the repelling factor is lessened, and the north and south poles of the neutron are then attracted to the north and south poles of protons more easily. This is also why neutrons tend to form pairs.

The inner core of an electron does not expand as the field around it expands. Instead, the more energy particles that are picked up, the greater the repulsion of the energy particles, and thus the field enlarges. The fields can equalize between electrons in an atom, but if the energy particles are added too quickly, the outer electrons will sling off the excess particles in the form of quanta of varying amounts and speeds, depending on three factors, one, the amount of energy particles picked up, two, the quickness the energy particles were added to the system, three, the strength of gravity attraction near the source of the energy offload.

Force can only be created by moving objects. Fields of force can only be created by moving particles.

The smaller the wave, and the more energy the wave has, the more it will behave as a solid.

The wave forms around atomic particles behave very closely to solid objects. Electron orbits, being so small, can transmit, and amplify inner vibrations and waves, and act as resonators.

Electron orbits within material can resonate wave forms from central atoms and molecules and create larger echoing wave forms and orbitals for energy particles around the material. This is how magnets made of iron and other materials so easily form outer orbitals that the energy particles can follow, and thus induce force effects that can seem very solid.

The structure of the material can block or amplify the field force, or energy particle orbitals, by being crystallized in such a way as to block inner electron orbital resonance, or to enhance inner electron orbital resonance.

The more electron orbitals a material has, the easier it is for the inner electron orbitals to slowly align to the horizon of the axis in the majority of protons and weakly so, to the neutron, because the more orbitals you have, the less the inner orbitals are affected by outer molecule bonding, and are thus free to orbit protons instead of being diverted out of shape by other electron orbitals in the outer area of the other atoms.

Electrons will seek to orbit protons at a 90 degree angle to the proton or protons they are orbiting.

Electrons can, when close enough to the orbits of other electrons, be pulled into the orbit of another proton, and the two electrons will and can exchange proton orbits. If an electron can not orbit a proton efficiently because of the proximity of more electrons and or other protons, it will expand its orbit and orbit the closest attractive source, at 90 degrees to the horizon of that source.

Electricity through wires is the movement of quanta from one electron orbit to the other, along the path of least resistance. A magnetic field is created in the wire due to the fact that the electrons in the material accept the quanta, expand, and thus temporarily allow the protons and inner electron orbitals to wiggle into alignments more along the 90 degrees angle to the their protons. Thus, turning the wire into a string of magnets, with swollen electron quanta fields that surround the wire and make a path of least resistance for the impulse of quanta, the wave, or the discharge of quanta, to travel along the wire, mostly on the outside, depending on the material’s crystal or bonding structure which can allow for easier inner pathways for the quanta to travel down the wire.

The colder some materials are, the less vibration in the system of atoms and bonds, the more easily, then, for inner electron orbitals to maintain better 90 degree angles to the protons, thus enabling some materials to become super conductors at lower temperatures.

It is very likely, that the wave vibrations of the inner orbiting particle of a proton causes wiggle waves that attract other objects. In normal space, the more this wave is amplified, the more it behaves as magnetic attraction.

But in subspace, this wiggle wave is amplified, when stresses in normal space on an atom are amplified. Thus stars, who have greatly stressed inner protons, will greatly stress and wiggle the waves of the subspace particles that create them, amplifying the magnetic effect, which pulls on other subspace particles more greatly, and is magnetism in subspace, but in normal space, we feel the pull as gravity.

Remember that the smaller the wave, and more energy it has, the more it behaves as a solid, the same holds true in subspace.

Quantum entanglement, or spooky action at a distance is a subspace anomaly. This is why in our normal space, we see the two objects, when one is acted upon by a force, the other, no matter how far away from the force, acts as if it too were that very same particle, moving away from the force even though there is none in its vicinity. However, in subspace, the two particles have not finished unbinding from the creation process, and thus their subspace connection is still strong enough to push one, when the other is pushed.

Gravity affects stars and planets nearly at real time, faster than the speed of light, but if gravity is subspace magnetism on our normal space’s particle’s subspace connections, then gravity isn’t really going faster than the speed of light, or attracting faster than the speed of light. Is it? It just seems that way. Because truly, it will attract at the speed in which magnetism attracts normal particles in normal space.

With much love from me to you….  ❤

proton1a Proton2 Proton3 proton4b

The reason the Electron is at the bottom of the inner core, is because I believe the North pole has too much energy going up and out for the electron to easily find its way inside from that direction. As the particle streams go up and out, they are very energized, but as they come back around, they give off some of their energy, and thus, are loosely and less energetically brought back in by both attraction and orbital path. Once they come back in, they pick up speed and sling shot out again.

Thus, the electron most likely finds itself pushed, by crushing star gravities at their cores, or other phenomena, into the south end of a proton.

This predicts that neutrons, being magnets, but reduced in power, can get closer to protons than other protons, and can, because of the electron inside, actually pull on other protons a bit.

It’s not very precise, but little by little, I hope to polish this theory.

proton4n Helium43dhelium4a   Lithium6aLithium7b

Understanding Quantum Entanglement from a subspace perspective:

QE1a QE2a

subspaceg1a subspaceg2a

wiggle1b      wavesolidity1ab


1.  I would like to explain how I believe electrons work when moving through objects like conductors. In most cases, electrons are very happy to stay married to their proton that they orbit. Thus, instead of leaving that orbit to travel through a wire, they like to pass on the energy to a nearby electron that has less than they do. I believe that in many instances, what we think are electrons moving through wires, and yes, I’m sure many do, but in fact, a lot of it will probably be the energy packets that are flung off of electrons when they get too full.

My description of an electron is fundamentally, like pac man. He’s going around the proton, and when he encounters a dot of quanta material, if he is full, he ignores it. If he is empty, he gobbles it up. Obviously, if there is too much in the area, they kind of get stuffed into him, he gets really fat, and is looking for a quick way to lose weight, because the fatter he gets, the more his orbit around his proton, miss pacman, becomes elongated, due to inertia of the extra mass, and the repulsion his normal ‘skin’ field has to her ‘skin’ field. It is this quanta field that keeps them apart when in the atom of hydrogen, and their are no neutrons around to repel them even more.

Anyway, this skin gets full, and he jumps up a level or two from his normal orbit, path, he has choices he can make when up there, let this food stuff fling off him as photons, such as when atoms heat up and they start glowing. Or he can touch another electron field ‘skin’ from another atom and give off energy as heat, friction, or he radiate quanta as other forms of radiation, depending on how much he ate, and how fast he needs to get rid of it.

In a wire, each pac man has a lot of neighbors, and they are usually in materials that have a lot of atoms with lots of electron orbitals, so they are out jogging away from the main homestead, passing the time, sharing a meal together, eating lots, or well, getting rid of lots of food waste, so on and on. So under normal circumstances, they really don’t have to leave their jogging routes. So energy can be passed from pac man to pac man just through doing ‘Bro’ bumps as they pass each other on the street.

Ah, but when a food truck accidentally gets dumped in the area of one side of the wire, ie electrical charge, and the other side of the wire has a famine, they talk about it real fast, and in a blink of an eye, they have carried all that food to the starving electrons, now, if there are unmarried protons at the other end, its not just a famine, its a real crisis. I mean, these guys, they like their women. The girls are wiggling their tails, so to speak, and those electrons know an invite when they see one, and yes, they will rush to that group of unmarried girls. But sadly, for the guys, they don’t realize that its a woman’s world, in the world of the atomic spaces, and they end up married before they even know what has happened. The girls grab up whoever is available, they are so attractive, many guys, electrons, in the street one block over, in a house, atom, with too many guys circling it, will jump at the chance to be with them, this is due to the attractive forces that match very strongly with the attractive forces in the electron. I mean, the protons, the girls, would very much jump to the electrons if they could, but right now, they are too bunched in this wire in this molecule to leave their home. So most of the time, the guys come to them.

This rush from street to street to find peace in the arms of a hot babe, is what we call current. the voltage is just how badly they want to go there, or sense them being single. Now, if the streets are cold, then, everything kind of settles down, as you said, I can imagine, then, that those spaces in the matrices do indeed open up a bit, and the path way for electrons to find the babes becomes a lot easier to do, helping to make the wires superconductive.

But my theory says that the streets that energy travel on, the food of the electrons, can make trails, or orbits further away from the electrons than most people realize, and thus a lot of energy can be transported through these other channels.

These food trails stretch out past the wires and surround them, because atoms can do something very amazing inside of them.

Your idea of fluid dynamics playing a part in atomic processes is very interesting because my theory is that the smaller the particle and the faster it moves, the more solid it behaves, very much like water under pressure. A fire hose, with lots of particles, water, is limp, until energy is added, more water, and it firms up. I haven’t applied this idea to atomic structures, but since the particles tend to travel in well defined orbits, or in strings, they could very well have fluid like pressures. I don’t know, I’d have to think about it some more.

You may be asking, how can electrons and electron skins, so to speak, form orbitals, or new streets way outside their normal paths?

My theory states that since electrons will always try to stay at 90 degrees to their proton partner, or to the general axis of the neutron/proton complex, the nucleus, then all the electrons will generally try to be on the same plane, this 90 degree tug is stronger than electrons pushing away from each other, but they do, and in an atom that is really unorganized inside, the electrons will make streets just about anywhere they can find a nice path. But if the protons and neutrons are stacked up a little better on the inside, then the electrons will try to straighten up a little flatter.

All these electron streets, at the size they are, are very, very fast around the proton. By the time they walk the trail, they can almost see themselves walking up ahead. Not quite like going in the past or time travel, just really really fast jogging going on. Because of this, like putting your hand on a fan blade that is moving, you tend to touch the plastic blades more than the spaces when the blade is not quite in that area. Because of this near physicality, the streets can act as harmonizing rings, or rings of metal, like the ice seems to make around Saturn. Up close, its just a bunch of objects in orbit, but far away, it looks like solid rings, so much so, that light reflects off of them brightly because there are so many things there reflecting the light.

Well, vibrations and waves can literally bounce off of electron orbits because the orbits are so fast and so energized. And when vibrations set up in the inner rings, they vibrate this toward the outer rings.

Like a tuning fork. One side is hit, the waves travel in the air, hit the other side, and makes it shake the same way, and they form resonance.

If, you have six atoms in a circle. And each atom is aligned to each other atom, and all their poles are pointed up, and their horizons or equators are pointed at each other, then when one atom starts singing, the other orbits nearby, will start humming the same tune. They can resonate so strongly, that the quanta skins of the electrons cant really tell who to wrap themselves around, and thus travel along the wave fronts of the singing, in a circle around the six atoms. They will only go so far, because the quanta are about as attracted to electrons as electrons are to protons, in fact, sadly, you could almost call them their kids.

Now, when a ring of quanta particles becomes thick enough, the electrons can, i believe, accidentally jump down a trail of quanta, and circle the six atoms. Thus making expanded electron orbitals. This is especially true if the quanta trail is at 90 degrees to the main axis of the atomic nuclei. I mean, the electrons are literally surrounded by food, song, and wine. What else can they do but end up in someone else’s back yard?

2.   I was thinking that my theory unifies gravity, magnetism and electrical properties. But that wasn’t my main goal, oddly enough. My main goal was to understand how the atomic nucleus is organized and why electrons orbit them in circles instead of just sticking to the outside of them with static cling.

That may sound very simple, but in reality, there is a large amount of movement going on, when static cling could very well do the job by itself if all we wanted was a way to get electrons to stick to protons.

Why the extra movement?

Why orbitals?

Why didn’t electrons orbit protons or other electrons, in general?

What was special about protons, that they liked to enter into exclusive partnerships with electrons?

Why are their charges the same but opposite, and yet the electrons are so much smaller?

The answer to that is that there is something inside the proton attracting the electron with an equal but negative charge. And that some kind of particle field streams “skins” were keeping the two from sticking together more closely. And that the particle inside the proton “skin” was circling something in the very center of the proton, thus the electron was naturally compelled to run around the proton skin and chasing its dream mate, in circles. This particle is obviously smaller than the skin of the proton, so odds are, it is the same size as the electron, thus enabling the two charges to have both an charge symmetry as well as a physical symmetry.

Now, if my theory is true, then it predicts one thing, and discounts a very famous principle.

It predicts, that the wiggle vibration is formed from this single inner proton particle due to the pull on it by the attraction of the electron circling way outside in its electron orbital as it chases it.

This is, I believe the cause of gravity waves, or helps to cause gravity waves, technically, attraction waves that act as enhanced attraction in normal space, magnetization, when in a group of atoms where the waves are amplified because they are all on the same general level, and magnetism in subspace, that expands its effect because the space is smaller to other particles down there, but up here, acts like gravity.

Now the principle I’m about to predict the failure of, in general is a big one.

But if you take a hydrogen atom, and can closely measure the electron’s orbital size, and measure the time of the wiggle of the inner proton particle as it occurs, you can predict and find the electron in its orbital as it quickly chases this particle.

Do you recall what theory that this prediction, if found true, will prove to be false? For if I am right, then we can know where and when an electron, and maybe other particles, will be, with a good degree of certainty.

3.  The aether problem.

I remember a while back, that some people did tests in the part of space the earth was headed to, and the part of space it had just left, and they found a kind of drag effect. They postulated that this drag could be caused by aether.

However, my theory states that quanta form particle streams around resonating waves caused by the inner waves of atoms from being super energized and almost solid because of how fast they move. Thus, these resonating wave fronts act like orbital paths that quanta can stream into and circulate through. As these get bigger and bigger, they can form the guass lines, and other fields, thus they can extend like an atmosphere around objects, big or small, planets, or little hand held magnets, stars or black holes in the middle of a galaxy.

So in effect, there is an aether, it is just highly organized, and like the gasses around a planet, found in layers around celestial objects that have the resonating polarization needed to make them from within.

This is how you can have drag in space, but these effects should only be found in the vicinity of celestial objects, out in deep space, space is thinner, and the effect of drag could very well be nil.