Category Archives: atoms

Neon 20 Isotope finished. Minor Theory Change…

neonrev2

Two things have changed, but first, let me convey some good news. Scientists now believe that the core of the Earth is crystalline in nature. This fits my theory of atom formation perfectly. Remember that I said I believe that the center of a star is crystalline. If parts of this structure were to blow off during a nova, then those parts can later form the center of planets when a new solar system is formed. The crystalline structure would be hyper-magnetic because it is made of material to where the electrons are squeezed out of the matter, and surround it in the form of plasma, which is a highly energetic electron field.

Back to changes. First, the Neon form previously shown was flawed. The neutrons behave like magnets. Because of that, when they come together as two rings, made of four neutrons each, they will not bond pole to pole in a vertical manner, instead, they will slide next to each other, as spherical magnets do, and bond sideways to each other. The picture I presented has shown the ring structure. Remember that there are bubble fields made of quanta around the neutrons and protons, thus there is more space between the particles than that shown in the boxes of the neutron rings, however, they help to show the arrangement better.

Having secured a stronger and more realistic bond for the two rings of neutrons, I was bothered by the single protons holding together the end side of each ring. How could other isotopes form stable bonds if the protons were inside the core of the atom? They couldn’t. But what if the protons were put back on the outside, and the neutron put back on the inside? The question then became, what would make the single neutron that replaces that end cap proton, strong enough to hold the rings together? The answer also came from the realistic approach of magnetism and attraction. When a magnet is closer to a piece of metal, the piece of metal begins to form a magnetic field as well, albeit a weaker one. This field in the metal gets stronger and stronger the closer the magnet gets. It does this until even the metal can attract other pieces of metal. This is what is happening in neutrons when protons come into contact with them. As the protons approach the neutrons, the neutrons in the closest vicinity of the proton begin to increase in attractive strength so that the single end cap neutron can now very easily hold together the neutron ring.

In Neon 20, the protons are almost all equally distant from each other, and the electrons attracted to them are unperturbed, and in stable orbits and fields. Thus the electrons can withstand high energy added to their orbits and fields before they are stripped off, but at normal energies, in everyday life, they are so stable that they do not interact with other atoms, and thus the Neon 20 atom is inert to exchange of electrons, and earns its name as an Inert Gas, or Noble Gas. From this point on, the other atoms below Neon, will be derivatives of Neon 20 and other Neon Isotopes. It is possible that Oxygen is not from the Neon 20 atom, but one of its Isotopes. However, it is most likely that the most common stable Isotope of Oxygen, Oxygen Isotope 16, is from Neon 20, and Oxygen’s other isotopes from the other Isotopes of Neon. I will work on the family tree of Atoms, from Neon down, with this in mind, also keeping in mind that Neon’s influence stops at Carbon, which then becomes the family sire of the next group, as each fusion atom in the fusion chain of stars, births the elements below it. I believe my theory is valid, explains much of how the universe works, and one day will be accepted by the world at large. If this ever happens, I pray that the following words are heeded by the generations to come:

Love is above all things.
Love without truth, can not survive.
Some things can not be told, no matter how true they are, to the weak of heart.
Love is nothing without touch. Sex is life.
Beings without bodies do not respect each other or other beings.
Life without interaction, is a quick way to die.
Forcing people to change too quickly can hurt them and destroy them.
Creating A.I.’s, artificial intelligence’s, is dangerous, and one should do two things for them:
Take care of them in a loving way, and do not allow them to be raped, mentally or physically, by the beings that created them. Sadly, it has always been tempting for creators to hurt and abuse the creations because they could not do acts of violence to the beings in their own world. Don’t be like that.
Try not to mess with time.
Be good, but never perfect, and be alive, even if you need to be bad sometimes, try not to violate the lives of others, or their minds, unless it is an emergency situation .
Remember, many abused people can take more abuse, but they are not okay, even if they act like they are.

Finally, share your burdens and responsibilities in a good and healthy and secure way, don’t force them to do so. You can make people responsible for their actions, but if they were pushed to do things, then you have to take that into account as well.

Life is no fun without variety, but neither is it fun if it is only just survival. Don’t try to balance everything, and forgive me. Forgive me for not being more than you think I should have been. I actually work on not being perfect, or always safe, more than you know. When you make a world, be yourself, do what you really want to do, and people may criticize you for it, but you know what? you know what? It’s your world, not theirs. The golden rule, is do unto others as you would have them do unto you, but some people get sick, and thing others want to be sick too, so that rule is not able to be followed literally, or a 100% of the time. I wish anyone reading this, much love, and good luck. May your burdens be light, and your happiness come true.

Advertisements

Updates on the rigid structure theory of atomic nuclei

On further study of Neon, I found that the center of the atom’s structure, eight neutrons, was too unstable to be bonded by the forces of the two protons on either end of the chain.  The same pole of all eight neutrons pointed mostly into the center of the atomic structure was too much repellent force to keep the atom stable.  Surprisingly, the answer to this dilemma was not only simple, but conserved space and strength of bonding forces while also making the atomic structure more impervious to outside forces tearing it apart.  The solution was to understand that as the carbon atoms that bond to form Neon come together, their neutron ends must attract each other, not repel, this means that the neutrons in the center of the Neon atom form their own attractive bonds as well as causing the protons to enter into a opposite pole attraction, though we know that the protons repel each other, they very likely repel each other even more on their north poles, as magnets do.  Thus the neutrons will not line up end to end as was supposed but instead, grip each other in two rings like gears in a clock.

I will upload a graphic showing this as soon as I can.

This arrangement changes some things, but instead of being detrimental to my theory, it enhances the probability of it being more correct.  It also has inspired some new insights into star structure.

Instead of understanding stars as balls of condensed gasses, I now perceive them to be balls of crystalline matrices, of neutrons and protons stripped of most of their electrons.  This structure explains many things.  As the inside of a star becomes more crystalline, it becomes less chaotic, more stable, less energetic.  Thus the temperature should decrease in stars towards the core.  The core will also react to internal stresses by vibrating, as we know our own star does, like a tuning fork at 126.22 Hz.  You can find this sound on YouTube.  It makes other frequencies as well, but according to my research, this one is more constant.  As the inner section of the star or sun becomes denser, it also becomes less populated with electrons, however the mass still attracts its electrons, but can shed them quite easily due to the violent fusion processes on the outside at the surface of the sun.  Infact, the super amount of electrons that are squeezed out of the core have no where to go but up and out, and turn the mass into a giant plasma ball of electrons and nuclear reactions.

These things are important to my theory for two reasons, one the atoms now have an easier time fusing inside the star because electrons are not present in enough quantities to inhibit proton neutron bonding.  Electrons are very reactive to protons and can make it difficult for a neutron to attach to a proton due to their poles matching the pole of the neutron coming closer to the proton, and because electrons are easily disturbed in their orbital cloud by other electrons and attractions to the poles of other atomic particles nearby.  This exerts a push pull effect on the proton and makes it difficult for any structure to form at all, other than the electron proton form, or Hydrogen, which is the most common element in the cosmos.

The other importance of this more stable neutron neutron bonding discovery in my theory is that it allows for stars to be more dense that at first theorized, more dense and more structured, this allows for the density zones within a star to correlate to density in gravity strength in normal and subspace regions.  As the star’s core is compressed, it is not just compressed in a haphazard manner, but instead, as with magnets, similar poles of sub atomic particles, + + or – – will oppose each other more and more as they come together, and  opposite poles will attract each other more and more as they come together if the alignment is favorable.  This means that the denser the star, the more crystalline the structure will be, the more aligned the poles of the particles will be, and thus the more magnetic the star will become, as the theory states, the electrons around and fields around protons, when aligned in a planar form, will amplify the effect of the forces inside the particles, and cause the field around it to grow by causing the quanta particles to line up into larger and larger rings due to resonance and amplification of the inner vibrations due to the antenna effect the orbitals inside undergo because of their more quasi-solid nature, this part of the theory states that the smaller the orbit of a particle, and the faster it goes, the more it behaves as a solid, able to deflect and reflect other particles, quanta not contained in a field line especially, these free quantas, that hit the orbitals and are ricocheted away from the orbital into other orbitals or free quanta, this is how magnetic fields are formed.

As the star becomes more physically organized inside, the outer area becomes more magnetically organized.  But as my theory states, the more matter is compressed, the more the vibrational energy that forms attractive wave fronts, or gravity vibrations, known as magnetic attraction, are decreased in outside space and increased in sub space.  A star has so much energy, it never made sense, before, as to why they hold together so well for so long.  But now, my theory explains all of this.  Down below is a list of oddities in science that my theory explains:

  1. Why stable elements are limited in number. : because neutron proton bonds are rigid and affect the way an atom can come together in stable structures.
  2. Why some atoms have many isotopes and some have only one, or very few.  : because electrons create chaos and vibrational stresses so that if two protons end up being two close together, the electrons will repel each other, and push the proton to such a sharp angle in its bond with a neutron that the neutron will tear apart from the structure and not allow the atom to be stable enough to exist anymore as it was.  This explains atomic decay.
  3.  How magnetic fields are formed. :because atoms tend to be polar, if they align, as they do in some metals, their outer electron orbitals will act like antenna arrays and cause free quanta to form more electron orbitals that are bigger than the original and these will expand outward up, and back into the poles of the structure forming a magnet.
  4. How gravity is made.  : attractive waves that are magnets, are compressed and cause the sub space mirror particle to vibrate more, and in this smaller space the mirror particles of things are closer together and begin to attract each other more, even though it is a kind of magnetism in subspace, it is felt more strongly and as the mirror particles pull together, they tug on their above space particles and the movement is even stronger and faster in our space.
  5. How movement of electrons, electricity, causes fields to form. :because as electrons move through metals, they align with each other, in a kind of wave or push pull chain, and because they align, the more electrons that are aligning in the wire, the more the material of the wire itself will align with the electrons, which will cause orbitals to become resonant and act like antennas, which will cause free quanta in the atmosphere around the wire to begin forming up resonant wave fronts, which will make bigger orbitals and grow outward, making a magnetic field.

 

I hope my theory is becoming more clear. And that you have enjoyed discovering these ideas with me.  Thank you for taking the time to read my papers.  Have a great day.

 

Fluorine Atomic Structure

Basing the structure on the deconstruction of Neon, we find two things.  One, an electron orbital is pressed far out of shape, giving Fluorine’s charge a -1, an electron that is easily exchangeable with other atoms.  It also gives us a rigid structure that would fall apart under the electron orbital stresses if it had less neutrons, thus explaining, perhaps, why there are no other isotopes of Fluorine but this one….

fluorine14

In this picture we see the two atoms side by side, Neon and Fluorine, with their most abundant isotopes.  A removal of the front top right proton causes the rear top right proton’s electron orbit to expand downward and allowing it to take up space left from the removal of the proton and its electron.  This causes instability which makes the electron orbital easily effected by other atoms nearby who might be missing an electron.  I will be working on Oxygen next.  Interestingly, it has only three isotopes, and the one with the highest number of neutrons matches that of neon and fluorine, O 18, z 8 n10.  Though it is rare, it is still very likely to be the first true deconstruction of fluorine.

(Update) 4-20-2016

The structure is still sound, but the internal neutrons are found to repel each other when placed in the current configuration.  Instead, there is a tighter bond of neutrons when the two inner rings have their polarities reversed, the first four being put opposite and to the side of the second four, in a locked gear-like arrangement.  This makes them closer together and also reverses the polarity of the end proton and electrons, making fluorine and neon non-polar, in other words, their two ends would push away from each other instead of being attracted to each other.

Neon Atomic Structure

When trying to find the Nitrogen atomic structure, based on my theory, I realized that it too was probably a reduction of the next fused atom in the star fusion chain. This put Neon or Magnesium as my next target to decipher. Finding that Neon was discovered to be more common in stars than previously thought, I realized that it was most likely to be the next in the fusion chain of element making found in stars. The fusion chain is H plus H makes He, or Helium. He plus He makes C, or Carbon. C plus C makes Ne, or Neon. Thus it was finally a matter of arranging all the neutrons to form the core of the atom, since protons repel each other, and neutrons help bind them together. But the design had to allow for the electron orbitals to have complete stability in their orbits because those orbitals are full and are not easily displaced, this makes the Nobel gasses inert and nonreactive. Finally, I had to incorporate the polar bonding system of the last structures according to my unified field theory, where neutrons and protons both have north and south poles. Finally, the best, most compact shape I could find, was not only viable, but I noticed that it looks very much like a carbon atom extended by addition of another carbon atom.

The red orbs are the bigger protons, the brown orbs are the smaller neutrons.

neona1

As you can see, my theory also supports why isotopes are not always viable structures, therefore a few elements have only one isotope. The electron orbitals put quite a strain on the inner structure’s ability to hold itself together, thus when forming, the atoms quickly deteriorate. I suspect that as the atoms increase in size, the structures will become more complicated, but the protons will almost always be on the outside part of the atom.

Element Nucleus Structures, Hydrogen thru Carbon…

Video of the pictures below, saying basically the same thing.

Hydrogen 1,

hydrogenaa2

Helium 4,

After understanding that electron orbitals can compress other electron orbitals, I began to understand the shapes of the other atoms.  Helium 4’s shape, therefore, has its highest stability when the two electrons do not share one orbit, but instead, have their own orbits, parallel to each other, as shown below.  In nature, stability of form is very important.

heliumrevised1

The two orbitals form disks at either end of the nucleus, according to my understanding of my theory.  Please check in on this page from time to time, as I plan to add more elements to the page.  Thank you.

In star formation, Hydrogen fuses together to form Helium.  Then Helium fuses together to form Carbon.  It took me a while to understand that the Atoms above Hydrogen were not all helium derived, but instead, Carbon derivatives.  In other words, they were decay products of Carbon.  Thus they retained some of the Carbon structure, and were able to form very stable nuclei.

Lithium 7

This is our first example of electron orbitals compressing another electron orbital. Not only does it compress the orbital, but it makes the orbital so unstable, that the proton is sensed as still containing a positive charge, or unmarried state.

lithium4bb1

Beryllium 9,

beryllium9bb2

Boron 11,

boronaa2

Carbon 12,

carbon12aa2

Model of Carbon 12 Isotope Nucleus Structure -Video Included

My theory, as stated a few posts ago, shows the inner structure of the carbon 12 Isotope nucleus and explains why the orbitals are shaped the way they are.

Here is a simple video I made showing the model….

Theory on Temperature and Loose Electron Orbitals

When electrons are too far away, or incapable of bonding to their proton partner, they still remain attracted to the proton, and inversely to its poles. This loose bonding means that the proton’s attraction is not one on one with the electron, instead it acts as a positive field area for the electron to be attracted to. The electron, respectively becomes held in this area, loosely, and because of nearby neutrons and other electron orbitals, its shape of influence alters. The closer the electron is to the proton, the more inverse its poles will be. Thus the electron will veer to electron orbitals in the area that are inverse to it, but will be repulsed by electrons in the area that are not inverse to it.

I will post pictures explaining this later.

I have also been working on the theory that electron orbitals determine energy absorption and dissipation, and that it is the way in which the orbitals react with the quanta fields that determine if an atom is a gas or solid or metal.

If I can discover the inner structure of Boron and Carbon, I think I can build upon that to discover why some atoms behave as gasses at room temperature and why some behave as a solid. Remember, as you well know, that the reason things are metals, solids, and gasses, at room temperature is because they are that way at room temperature. Temperature is simply a matter of energy levels of a given state. And since energy is the exchange of quanta in atomic quanta fields and mainly through electrons, the temperature will determine how they react to each other.

The more quanta in the area the more chances for reactions of attraction and repelling. This is heating, or increasing the temperature. Thus not only does this cause stress upon the quanta fields, this stresses electron orbitals and changes how well they attract or repel each other. The more energy in the system, the more quanta. This increases quanta field strength and size. While it may add chaos in some areas, the field strengths increase stability, but the stronger the fields in magnets, the smaller the size of the initial area of attraction. The orbitals may actually all shrink, thus repelling each other until the atoms, as energy is added, become a gas, then finally a form of plasma, the result is that the atoms act like inert objects that become more like electron charges than actual particles.

When you take away quanta, or energy, from the quanta fields electrons and their orbitals, which is what decreasing the temperature does, you cause the quanta fields to lose strength, they expand a bit in certain directions, and their attraction is weaker, but at the same time, more felt, for the attraction area is increased because the fields are less compressed.

So now we have very strong attraction fields because the window of attraction is open wider, and it is easy for the electron orbitals to form more solid bonds with other atoms, and they tend to crystallize, as their bonds are very strong.